DOS ain't dead

DR-DOS 8.1 (Announce)

posted by Rugxulo , Usono, 22.11.2007, 10:41

> Hm. I expected more. Then hail to
> http://www.vetusware.com pirates to
> make it free againg, hehe

Not recommended, even if DR-DOS is basically stagnant. Granted, the OpenDOS fiasco (as I call it) didn't help anybody anywhere (still not sure why they bothered or even why they closed src up again). Anyways, despite its limitations, $35 ain't bad for a multitasking DOS (FAT16 only). They should hire Udo and contribute their own expertise to FreeDOS, ROM DOS, RxDOS, etc. (but that's just my lowly opinion). BTW, what ever happened to Matthias Paul?? Oh well, whatever.

Too bad people/developers lose interest in things so quickly (FreeDOS-32, ELKS, DR-DOS). This is why we all need to do our best to make free software better and available to everyone. I mean, computers are cool and fun (if they work), and nobody should have a working computer collecting dust due to no decent OS. And I'm a big fan of backwards compatibility (who isn't?). I don't think we need to let old software die if it works perfectly well. Everything new always seems to be bigger, more bloated, slower, etc. without any reason. Oh well, guess I'm just a silly idealist!

Complete thread:

• DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 21.11.2007, 18:02 (Announce)
  • DR-DOS 8.1 - Laaca, 21.11.2007, 18:55
    • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 21.11.2007, 19:13
      • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:50
  • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 00:50
    • DR-DOS 8.1 - david, 22.11.2007, 08:33
      • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 10:14
        • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 10:41
          • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 11:17
            • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 11:23
              • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 11:44
                • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:28
                  • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 12:54
                    • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 13:05
                      • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 16:39
                        • Vista - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 17:32
                          • Vista - Steve, 22.11.2007, 17:59
                            • Vista - sol, 22.11.2007, 18:11
                              • Vista - Steve, 22.11.2007, 19:06
                            • Vista - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 18:12
                              • Vista - sol, 22.11.2007, 19:43
                                • Vista - sol, 22.11.2007, 20:01
                                  • Vista - sol, 22.11.2007, 20:37
                          • Vista - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 21:31
              • DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 13:23
                • DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 13:26
                  • DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 13:31
                    • DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 14:02
                      • DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 14:49
                        • DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 14:59
                          • DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 15:12
                  • DR-DOS 8.1 - Laaca, 22.11.2007, 15:24
                    • DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 15:55
                • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 13:37
                  • DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 15:07
                    • Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 15:43
                      • Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 16:26
                        • Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 17:13
                          • Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - Steve, 22.11.2007, 17:18
                          • Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 17:18
                      • Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - Steve, 22.11.2007, 16:28
                        • Vista's pre-SP1 (in)compatibility - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 17:19
                      • Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - flox, 22.11.2007, 17:00
            • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:39
              • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 13:06
                • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 13:18
        • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:23
          • DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 12:29
          • DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 14:42
            • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 26.11.2007, 20:20
            • DR-DOS 8.1 - DOS386, 12.12.2007, 02:09
          • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 16:58
            • DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 20:51
              • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 21:16
              • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 23.11.2007, 02:06
                • DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 23.11.2007, 09:27
                  • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 24.11.2007, 14:33
            • UIDE caches even disks for which it doesn't do UDMA - lucho, 24.11.2007, 09:09
              • UIDE caches even disks for which it doesn't do UDMA - RayeR, 24.11.2007, 17:39
  • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 10:13
    • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 10:27
      • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 10:53
        • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 11:31
          • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:36
            • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 17:11
      • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 11:19
        • DR-DOS 8.1 - flox, 22.11.2007, 15:37
          • TriDOS -- DPMI bug? - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 16:20
            • TriDOS -- DPMI bug? - flox, 22.11.2007, 17:02
          • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 26.11.2007, 20:24
      • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 26.11.2007, 20:23
        • DR-DOS 8.1 - jaybur, 27.11.2007, 02:12
  • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 13:45
  • DR-DOS 8.1 piracy :-( - DOS386, 12.12.2007, 02:00
    • DOS -- single-tasking? - Rugxulo, 12.12.2007, 18:26
      • DOS -- single-tasking? - Steve, 14.12.2007, 06:06
        • DOS -- single-tasking? - Rugxulo, 14.12.2007, 08:24
        • DOS -- single-tasking? - DOS386, 15.12.2007, 18:59
          • DOS -- single-tasking? - Rugxulo, 16.12.2007, 00:44