Vista (Announce)
> While it's true there's no natural or purely technical reason a
> text-based/command-line interface couldn't be retained --- there certainly
> were plenty of solid technical reasons DOS shouldn't have been.
Not the same old DOS, but a functional equivalent with the same advantages, and enhancemets like full 32-bits (64-bits?). Maybe with choice between new and old command processors.
> If it were possible to release a new version of windows that was very
> stable, more secure and harder to crash with DOS still under it, I'm sure
> they would've done it.
If MS would have done it if they could, then they didn't because they couldn't. So the question would be, why couldn't they? Other OSes have multiple access layers that some programmers, somewhere, knew how to write. If MS isn't hiring them and selling their products, there's a reason: Backward compatibility is not profitable.
Complete thread:
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 21.11.2007, 18:02 (Announce)
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Laaca, 21.11.2007, 18:55
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 21.11.2007, 19:13
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:50
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 21.11.2007, 19:13
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 00:50
- DR-DOS 8.1 - david, 22.11.2007, 08:33
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 10:14
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 10:41
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 11:17
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 11:23
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 11:44
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:28
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 12:54
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 13:05
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 16:39
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 13:05
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 12:54
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:28
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 13:23
- DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 13:26
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 13:31
- DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 14:02
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 14:49
- DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 14:59
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 15:12
- DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 14:59
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 14:49
- DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 14:02
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Laaca, 22.11.2007, 15:24
- DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 15:55
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 13:31
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 13:37
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 15:07
- Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 15:43
- Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 16:26
- Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 17:13
- Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - Steve, 22.11.2007, 17:18
- Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 17:18
- Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 17:13
- Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - Steve, 22.11.2007, 16:28
- Vista's pre-SP1 (in)compatibility - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 17:19
- Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - flox, 22.11.2007, 17:00
- Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 16:26
- Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 15:43
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 15:07
- DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 13:26
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 11:44
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:39
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 13:06
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 13:18
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 13:06
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 11:23
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 11:17
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:23
- DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 12:29
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 14:42
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 26.11.2007, 20:20
- DR-DOS 8.1 - DOS386, 12.12.2007, 02:09
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 16:58
- DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 20:51
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 21:16
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 23.11.2007, 02:06
- DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 23.11.2007, 09:27
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 24.11.2007, 14:33
- DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 23.11.2007, 09:27
- UIDE caches even disks for which it doesn't do UDMA - lucho, 24.11.2007, 09:09
- UIDE caches even disks for which it doesn't do UDMA - RayeR, 24.11.2007, 17:39
- DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 20:51
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 10:41
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 10:14
- DR-DOS 8.1 - david, 22.11.2007, 08:33
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 10:13
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 10:27
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 10:53
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 11:31
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:36
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 17:11
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:36
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 11:31
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 11:19
- DR-DOS 8.1 - flox, 22.11.2007, 15:37
- TriDOS -- DPMI bug? - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 16:20
- TriDOS -- DPMI bug? - flox, 22.11.2007, 17:02
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 26.11.2007, 20:24
- TriDOS -- DPMI bug? - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 16:20
- DR-DOS 8.1 - flox, 22.11.2007, 15:37
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 26.11.2007, 20:23
- DR-DOS 8.1 - jaybur, 27.11.2007, 02:12
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 10:53
- DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 10:27
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 13:45
- DR-DOS 8.1 piracy :-( - DOS386, 12.12.2007, 02:00
- DOS -- single-tasking? - Rugxulo, 12.12.2007, 18:26
- DOS -- single-tasking? - Steve, 14.12.2007, 06:06
- DOS -- single-tasking? - Rugxulo, 14.12.2007, 08:24
- DOS -- single-tasking? - DOS386, 15.12.2007, 18:59
- DOS -- single-tasking? - Rugxulo, 16.12.2007, 00:44
- DOS -- single-tasking? - Steve, 14.12.2007, 06:06
- DOS -- single-tasking? - Rugxulo, 12.12.2007, 18:26
- DR-DOS 8.1 - Laaca, 21.11.2007, 18:55