Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

Vista (Announce)

posted by Steve Homepage E-mail, US, 22.11.2007, 19:06

> While it's true there's no natural or purely technical reason a
> text-based/command-line interface couldn't be retained --- there certainly
> were plenty of solid technical reasons DOS shouldn't have been.

Not the same old DOS, but a functional equivalent with the same advantages, and enhancemets like full 32-bits (64-bits?). Maybe with choice between new and old command processors.

> If it were possible to release a new version of windows that was very
> stable, more secure and harder to crash with DOS still under it, I'm sure
> they would've done it.

If MS would have done it if they could, then they didn't because they couldn't. So the question would be, why couldn't they? Other OSes have multiple access layers that some programmers, somewhere, knew how to write. If MS isn't hiring them and selling their products, there's a reason: Backward compatibility is not profitable.

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 435 users online (0 registered, 435 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum