DOS ain't dead

DR-DOS 8.1 (Announce)

posted by Rugxulo , Usono, 22.11.2007, 13:37

> Does Vista still have a COMMAND.COM, like XP? If so, have you tried using
> a replacement? If you try it and it works, I might get a Vista
> machine.

N.B. where and clip are new commands to Vista (as well as mklink, setx, tasklist, taskkill, schtasks, waitfor, etc.).

[ Vista ] - Thu 11/22/2007 >where /t command | clip

     50648   11/2/2006    1:09:49 AM  C:\Windows\System32\COMMAND.COM

I think that's probably the same one from WinME and also included with Win XP. But I don't think that is responsible for the 32 MB DPMI memory limit or weird console bugs or other issues.

> > (for MS, for freak's sake, since they invented DOS!).
>
> IBM invented DOS.

Actually, I should've said MS mostly developed DOS. DR-DOS was independent and brought unique stuff (LOADHIGH). PC DOS was eventually completely separate from MS-DOS (after 5.x?). And you know the rest probably much better than me!

P.S. Tim Paterson indeed wrote QDOS, which was basically a CP/M clone for the 8086 that MS bought and adapted for their own use (sublicensed to IBM).

Complete thread:

• DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 21.11.2007, 18:02 (Announce)
  • DR-DOS 8.1 - Laaca, 21.11.2007, 18:55
    • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 21.11.2007, 19:13
      • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:50
  • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 00:50
    • DR-DOS 8.1 - david, 22.11.2007, 08:33
      • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 10:14
        • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 10:41
          • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 11:17
            • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 11:23
              • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 11:44
                • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:28
                  • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 12:54
                    • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 13:05
                      • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 16:39
                        • Vista - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 17:32
                          • Vista - Steve, 22.11.2007, 17:59
                            • Vista - sol, 22.11.2007, 18:11
                              • Vista - Steve, 22.11.2007, 19:06
                            • Vista - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 18:12
                              • Vista - sol, 22.11.2007, 19:43
                                • Vista - sol, 22.11.2007, 20:01
                                  • Vista - sol, 22.11.2007, 20:37
                          • Vista - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 21:31
              • DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 13:23
                • DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 13:26
                  • DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 13:31
                    • DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 14:02
                      • DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 14:49
                        • DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 14:59
                          • DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 15:12
                  • DR-DOS 8.1 - Laaca, 22.11.2007, 15:24
                    • DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 15:55
                • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 13:37
                  • DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 15:07
                    • Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 15:43
                      • Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 16:26
                        • Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 17:13
                          • Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - Steve, 22.11.2007, 17:18
                          • Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 17:18
                      • Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - Steve, 22.11.2007, 16:28
                        • Vista's pre-SP1 (in)compatibility - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 17:19
                      • Vista's pre-SP1 DOS (in)compatibility - flox, 22.11.2007, 17:00
            • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:39
              • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 13:06
                • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 13:18
        • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:23
          • DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 12:29
          • DR-DOS 8.1 - Steve, 22.11.2007, 14:42
            • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 26.11.2007, 20:20
            • DR-DOS 8.1 - DOS386, 12.12.2007, 02:09
          • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 16:58
            • DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 22.11.2007, 20:51
              • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 21:16
              • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 23.11.2007, 02:06
                • DR-DOS 8.1 - rr, 23.11.2007, 09:27
                  • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 24.11.2007, 14:33
            • UIDE caches even disks for which it doesn't do UDMA - lucho, 24.11.2007, 09:09
              • UIDE caches even disks for which it doesn't do UDMA - RayeR, 24.11.2007, 17:39
  • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 10:13
    • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 10:27
      • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 10:53
        • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 11:31
          • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 12:36
            • DR-DOS 8.1 - RayeR, 22.11.2007, 17:11
      • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 11:19
        • DR-DOS 8.1 - flox, 22.11.2007, 15:37
          • TriDOS -- DPMI bug? - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 16:20
            • TriDOS -- DPMI bug? - flox, 22.11.2007, 17:02
          • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 26.11.2007, 20:24
      • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 26.11.2007, 20:23
        • DR-DOS 8.1 - jaybur, 27.11.2007, 02:12
  • DR-DOS 8.1 - Rugxulo, 22.11.2007, 13:45
  • DR-DOS 8.1 piracy :-( - DOS386, 12.12.2007, 02:00
    • DOS -- single-tasking? - Rugxulo, 12.12.2007, 18:26
      • DOS -- single-tasking? - Steve, 14.12.2007, 06:06
        • DOS -- single-tasking? - Rugxulo, 14.12.2007, 08:24
        • DOS -- single-tasking? - DOS386, 15.12.2007, 18:59
          • DOS -- single-tasking? - Rugxulo, 16.12.2007, 00:44