BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images (Announce)
> [-?] My HD images are no longer recognized (they are still fine for
> BOCHS 2.3.0 and QEMU 0.9.0)
That's an old hat, see http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=903
---
MS-DOS forever!
Complete thread:
- Bochs 2.3.6 available (Win32, Linux, sources) - rr, 29.12.2007, 20:37 (Announce)
- Bochs 2.3.6 available (Win32, Linux, sources) - sol, 31.12.2007, 03:16
- Bochs 2.3.6 available (Win32, Linux, sources) - RayeR, 31.12.2007, 14:14
- BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images - DOS386, 02.01.2008, 01:38
- BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 12:23
- BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" - DOS386, 05.01.2008, 02:16
- BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" - rr, 05.01.2008, 22:52
- BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" - Rugxulo, 06.01.2008, 04:59
- BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" - rr, 05.01.2008, 22:52
- BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" - DOS386, 05.01.2008, 02:16
- BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 12:23
- Bochs 2.3.6 available (Win32, Linux, sources) - sol, 31.12.2007, 03:16