DOS ain't dead

BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" (Announce)

posted by rr  , Berlin, Germany, 05.01.2008, 22:52

> Thanks for pointing ... but the old "hat" is still unfixed

Maybe because nobody made a proper bug report.

> What about the "speedup" ? I couldn't test anything except PKZIP because
> of the pretty limited space on a 1.4 MiB floppy

I tried to prove this speedup by running several old DOS benchmarks (streamd, speed600, ...) in Bochs 2.3/2.3.5/2.3.6, but I always get the same results. Maybe I (we?) misunderstood something?

---
Forum admin

Complete thread:

• Bochs 2.3.6 available (Win32, Linux, sources) - rr, 29.12.2007, 20:37 (Announce)
  • Bochs 2.3.6 available (Win32, Linux, sources) - sol, 31.12.2007, 03:16
    • Bochs 2.3.6 available (Win32, Linux, sources) - RayeR, 31.12.2007, 14:14
  • BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images - DOS386, 02.01.2008, 01:38
    • BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 12:23
      • BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" - DOS386, 05.01.2008, 02:16
        • BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" - rr, 05.01.2008, 22:52
          • BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" - Rugxulo, 06.01.2008, 04:59