DOS ain't dead

BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" (Announce)

posted by Rugxulo , Usono, 06.01.2008, 04:59

> I tried to prove this speedup by running several old DOS benchmarks
> (streamd, speed600, ...) in Bochs 2.3/2.3.5/2.3.6, but I always get the
> same results. Maybe I (we?) misunderstood something?

Maybe you could try this?

http://rugxulo.googlepages.com/paq8o8z-jan6.7z

---
Know your limits.h

Complete thread:

• Bochs 2.3.6 available (Win32, Linux, sources) - rr, 29.12.2007, 20:37 (Announce)
  • Bochs 2.3.6 available (Win32, Linux, sources) - sol, 31.12.2007, 03:16
    • Bochs 2.3.6 available (Win32, Linux, sources) - RayeR, 31.12.2007, 14:14
  • BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images - DOS386, 02.01.2008, 01:38
    • BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 12:23
      • BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" - DOS386, 05.01.2008, 02:16
        • BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" - rr, 05.01.2008, 22:52
          • BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" - Rugxulo, 06.01.2008, 04:59