Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Search:  
Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

Lawyers (Miscellaneous)

posted by Steve Homepage E-mail, US, 27.05.2008, 17:46

> > In the matters at hand, no, I'm not. I don't mean that I don't have any
> > preferences as to what system I wish to live under or not. But as to what
> > exists, I am open to new evidence and methods of analysis. You, however,
> > have shown none of that.
> Evidence for what?
Your claims.

> We can talk of evidence and methods of analysis only when people share the same principles.
If we share the principle that we should get the facts, whatever they are, yes. If you share that principle, then present facts, not insults and prejudices.

> but for you anyone who has other principles than you is stupid
> or lacks your ample life experience.
That has a grain of truth. I've seen shit that you have not.

> You can't abide the idea that someone can piss on your beloved burgeoise society, this is unbearable for you.
That's not true. Piss on bourgeois society all you want - I'm not in love with every aspect of it. But get the facts straight.

> > I did not introduce the topics of lawyers and "bourgeois" vs. "socialist"
> > systems. I have however, responded to some of your comments. If you are
> > not prepared to deal with that except by losing your temper, that's your
> > problem, not mine.
> You are the one incapable to argue, not me. You always have to throw an
> affront. This is pure indignity.
That's you. As we say, you can dish it out, but you can't take it.

> For such conduct you would have to pay for prejudices if brought to trial.
You hate freedom of speech for other people, don't you?

> Your chance is that no one really takes you seriously.
Do you think anyone takes you seriously?

Post reply
 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22752 Postings in 2119 Threads, 402 registered users (0 online)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum