Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

Ladsoft / CC386 back online (Announce)

posted by RayeR Homepage, CZ, 29.02.2008, 21:36

> However, it doesn't matter what DGPJJ has "done" in the past. What's
> relevant is if it is *still* the best choice for a DOS compiler. IMO: No.

I didn' studied it but how much is OW compatible with GCC? I'm happy that my sources (C + inlined asm) can be compiled under djgpp, mingw32, linux-gcc and sometimes also avr-gcc or arm-gcc without changes (of course except low-level hw dependent stuffs). Also djgpp can already use something like DLL - a DXE dynamically loadable modules but I tried it only once and didn't need to use it.
I agree that DJGPP exe's are greater than others but I think it's due to posix enverinment inside.

---
DOS gives me freedom to unlimited HW access.

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 419 users online (0 registered, 419 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum