Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

BIG "C" compiler comparison thread (Developers)

posted by Rugxulo Homepage, Usono, 05.03.2008, 01:06

> Don't forget Pacific C, which is a relatively good 286 compiler.

Versus Turbo C? Do you know how they compare on code generation?

> IMO better than many other old C compilers.

Well, they at one time said they'd release an improved version (open source?) and never did. I never really used it, but IIRC, it had some weird quirks in its output. Besides, ANSI C only (no C99, no C++, slightly buggy library).

> The 486 assembler from the package is also usable.

Non-standard syntax, no? And used a quite dreadful name for a debugger. But at least the IDE was fairly good.

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22747 Postings in 2119 Threads, 402 registered users, 134 users online (0 registered, 134 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum