I like the bin format (Announce)
> > > Linker can be useful/necessary if no HLLs are involved at all.
> >
> > Closed source pre-brewed LIB then.
>
> No. Just have a look at the RxDOS project for example, which consists of
> some dozens of assembly modules.
None of which are required if you don't have to reduce compilation time and CPU usage. My current source (which doesn't yet compile for other reasons) is written for NASM's multi-section bin format. Multiple %include directives in about 5 files bind all source files together. Compilation is now even easier because you had to link the object files in the correct order. Now you have to execute one command, once, to get all work done without any kind of complicated "makefile" or other script. (Yes, opposed to a FASM project you have to append a few options to that single command.)
> How half-done work (OBJ) can be better then fully done (EXE ready to run/crash) ?
Then again, most Real Mode DOS programs don't even need the MZ format. .COM (created by any good assembler's bin format) is fine for any program file below ~65280 Byte
---
l
Complete thread:
- JWasm v1.8pre - Japheth, 17.06.2008, 11:04 (Announce)
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing MA$M now ??? - DOS386, 18.06.2008, 12:23
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? - Japheth, 18.06.2008, 14:34
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? | Compiling RxDOS - ecm, 18.06.2008, 16:58
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? | Compiling RxDOS - Japheth, 18.06.2008, 19:17
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? | Compiling RxDOS - Rugxulo, 18.06.2008, 19:38
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? | Compiling RxDOS - Rugxulo, 19.06.2008, 23:43
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? | Compiling RxDOS - ecm, 20.06.2008, 12:58
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? | Compiling RxDOS - Rugxulo, 19.06.2008, 23:43
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? | Compiling RxDOS - ecm, 18.06.2008, 19:46
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? | Compiling RxDOS - Japheth, 18.06.2008, 19:55
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? | Compiling RxDOS - Rugxulo, 18.06.2008, 19:38
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? | Compiling RxDOS - Japheth, 18.06.2008, 19:17
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? - DOS386, 19.06.2008, 08:33
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? - Japheth, 19.06.2008, 10:02
- rxdos + jwasm - Japheth, 20.06.2008, 07:47
- JWasm v1.8pre | WLINK | PO | M | VALX - DOS386, 20.06.2008, 09:33
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? - Japheth, 19.06.2008, 10:02
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? | Compiling RxDOS - ecm, 18.06.2008, 16:58
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing good MASM now ??? - Japheth, 18.06.2008, 14:34
- JWasm v1.8pre - Rugxulo, 07.08.2008, 07:09
- JWasm v1.9 available - Japheth, 07.08.2008, 10:04
- JWasm v1.8pre - Rugxulo, 20.08.2008, 22:29
- JWasm v1.8pre - rr, 21.08.2008, 14:37
- JWasm v1.8pre - Rugxulo, 21.08.2008, 22:04
- JWasm v1.8pre - rr, 21.08.2008, 22:36
- JWasm v1.8pre - Rugxulo, 21.08.2008, 22:04
- JWasm v1.8pre - rr, 21.08.2008, 14:37
- JWasm Forum - Japheth, 14.08.2008, 16:41
- JWasm Forum - Rugxulo, 17.08.2008, 00:25
- JWasm v1.91 - Japheth, 20.08.2008, 07:02
- JWasm v1.91 - DOS386, 20.08.2008, 07:52
- JWasm v1.91 - Japheth, 20.08.2008, 10:33
- JWasm v1.91 - DOS386, 20.08.2008, 07:52
- JWasm v1.92 is out - Japheth, 23.09.2008, 09:48
- JWasm v1.92 is out - DOS386, 23.09.2008, 16:06
- JWasm v1.92 is out - Japheth, 24.09.2008, 14:03
- JWasm v1.92 is out - Steve, 24.09.2008, 23:44
- JWasm v1.92 is out | fixed old bug | added new bug - DOS386, 25.09.2008, 15:55
- JWasm v1.92 is out | fixed old bug | added new bug - Japheth, 25.09.2008, 17:21
- JWasm v1.92 is out | many bugs found - DOS386, 04.10.2008, 04:39
- JWasm v1.92 is out | many bugs found - Japheth, 04.10.2008, 08:53
- JWasm v1.92 is out | many bugs found - Rugxulo, 04.10.2008, 20:28
- JWasm v1.92 is out | many bugs found - DOS386, 05.10.2008, 13:47
- JWasm v1.92 is out | many bugs found - Japheth, 04.10.2008, 08:53
- JWasm v1.92 is out | many bugs found - DOS386, 04.10.2008, 04:39
- JWasm v1.92 is out | fixed old bug | added new bug - Japheth, 25.09.2008, 17:21
- JWasm v1.92 is out - Japheth, 24.09.2008, 14:03
- JWasm v1.92 is out - DOS386, 23.09.2008, 16:06
- JWasm v1.93 is out - Japheth, 26.10.2008, 20:06
- JWasm v1.93 is out - DOS386, 29.10.2008, 09:46
- JWasm v1.93 is out - Japheth, 29.10.2008, 13:59
- JWasm v1.93 is out - ecm, 29.10.2008, 19:59
- WARNING: your answers made me dangerously smart :-D - DOS386, 11.11.2008, 15:02
- WARNING: your answers made me dangerously smart :-D - Japheth, 07.12.2008, 15:04
- minor bug: REP CMPSB - Rugxulo, 07.12.2008, 20:28
- minor bug: REP CMPSB - Japheth, 07.12.2008, 22:37
- minor bug: REP CMPSB - Rugxulo, 07.12.2008, 20:28
- WARNING: your answers made me dangerously smart :-D - Japheth, 07.12.2008, 15:04
- JWasm v1.93 is out - Japheth, 29.10.2008, 13:59
- JWasm v1.93 is out - DOS386, 29.10.2008, 09:46
- JWasm v1.94 - Japheth, 19.12.2008, 18:19
- JWasm v1.94a and b - Japheth, 21.12.2008, 15:05
- JWasm v1.94a and b - Rugxulo, 23.12.2008, 07:13
- JWasm v1.94a, b and c - Japheth, 24.12.2008, 12:50
- JWasm v1.94a, b and c and 1.95 pre - DOS386, 29.12.2008, 01:27
- Reason isn't easy to find ... - Japheth, 29.12.2008, 08:31
- JWasm and FASM are more robust than others - Rugxulo, 29.12.2008, 23:28
- FASM is inferior for DOS programming - Japheth, 30.12.2008, 08:10
- FASM can't understand OMF ".OBJ" files - Rugxulo, 30.12.2008, 20:14
- FASM can't understand OMF ".OBJ" files - Japheth, 01.01.2009, 19:33
- FASM can't understand OMF ".OBJ" files - Rugxulo, 02.01.2009, 04:45
- FASM can't brew (!) OMF ".OBJ" files OBJCONV port it away - DOS386, 02.01.2009, 10:39
- FASM can't brew (!) OMF ".OBJ" files OBJCONV port it away - Japheth, 02.01.2009, 11:14
- I like the bin format - ecm, 02.01.2009, 19:00
- FASM lacks OMF/OBJ support (16- / 32-bit) - Rugxulo, 02.01.2009, 19:59
- FASM lacks OMF/OBJ support (16- / 32-bit) - ecm, 02.01.2009, 22:36
- FASM lacks OMF/OBJ support (16- / 32-bit) - DOS386, 04.01.2009, 11:17
- FASM lacks OMF/OBJ support (16- / 32-bit) - Rugxulo, 04.01.2009, 21:26
- FASM lacks OMF/OBJ support (16- / 32-bit) - DOS386, 04.01.2009, 11:17
- FASM lacks OMF/OBJ support (16- / 32-bit) - ecm, 02.01.2009, 22:36
- FASM lacks OMF/OBJ support (16- / 32-bit) - Rugxulo, 02.01.2009, 19:59
- I like the bin format - ecm, 02.01.2009, 19:00
- FASM can't brew (!) OMF ".OBJ" files OBJCONV port it away - Japheth, 02.01.2009, 11:14
- FASM can't understand OMF ".OBJ" files - Japheth, 01.01.2009, 19:33
- FASM is superior for DOS programming - DOS386, 30.12.2008, 22:40
- FASM can't understand OMF ".OBJ" files - Rugxulo, 30.12.2008, 20:14
- FASM is inferior for DOS programming - Japheth, 30.12.2008, 08:10
- JWasm and FASM are more robust than others - Rugxulo, 29.12.2008, 23:28
- Reason isn't easy to find ... - Japheth, 29.12.2008, 08:31
- JWasm v1.94a, b and c and 1.95 pre - DOS386, 29.12.2008, 01:27
- JWasm v1.94a, b and c - Japheth, 24.12.2008, 12:50
- JWasm v1.94a and b - Rugxulo, 23.12.2008, 07:13
- JWasm v1.94a and b - Japheth, 21.12.2008, 15:05
- JWasm BANNED - DOS386, 22.03.2009, 05:10
- No - Japheth, 22.03.2009, 06:42
- Overlay swopping and segment macros - ecm, 22.03.2009, 11:49
- No - Rugxulo, 27.03.2009, 17:00
- No - Japheth, 28.03.2009, 07:11
- No - Japheth, 22.03.2009, 06:42
- JWasm v1.8pre | killing MA$M now ??? - DOS386, 18.06.2008, 12:23