DOS ain't dead

Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test (Miscellaneous)

posted by lucho, 30.07.2007, 17:38

The eternal question: Which DOS to choose? Speed is also an important criteria! Today I did the following simple test. Copied a 68 MB file from one FAT32 drive with 16 KB clusters to another FAT32 drive with 4 KB clusters. The machine is a Celeron PIII-1.2GHz, ATA-66 HDD, 512 MB of RAM, with Jack's drivers loaded. The times in seconds (rounded to an integer number for clarity) are, as follows:

MS-DOS: 17
PC-DOS: 17
EDR-DOS: 33
PTS-DOS: 47
FreeDOS: 80
ROM-DOS: test failed resulting in hang-up and lost clusters.

(As to the alleged future in FreeDOS: No, it's past. All DOS is past. Let's face it. The only past that is future too is Unix. Eternal like the Egypt pyramids... Still alive and evolving in Mac OS X, Solaris, the BSD family, Linux and so on.)

Complete thread:

• Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - lucho, 30.07.2007, 17:38 (Miscellaneous)
  • Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - rr, 31.07.2007, 09:20
    • Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - lucho, 31.07.2007, 17:14
      • Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - rr, 31.07.2007, 17:34
      • Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - sol, 30.11.2007, 17:51
        • Speed differences negligible - Japheth, 03.12.2007, 12:25
          • Speed differences - be more specific - Rugxulo, 05.12.2007, 22:31
            • Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 05.12.2007, 23:02
            • Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 05.12.2007, 23:05
              • Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 13:01
                • Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 17:50
                  • Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 17:59
                    • Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:32
                      • Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:35
                      • Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 18:49
                        • Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:55
                          • Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 19:08
                            • Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 21:30
                              • Speed differences - be more specific - rr, 07.12.2007, 09:43
                              • Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 07.12.2007, 11:11
                                • Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 17:09
                                  • Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 07.12.2007, 20:22
                                    • Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 20:51
                                      • Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 07.12.2007, 21:27
                                        • Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 22:40
                                          • Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 07.12.2007, 23:20
                                            • Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 08.12.2007, 01:00
          • Speed differences negligible - sol, 06.12.2007, 01:14
  • Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - Rugxulo, 31.07.2007, 10:12
    • Who said that DOS was dead? - lucho, 31.07.2007, 19:07
      • Who said that DOS was dead? - Steve, 31.07.2007, 19:50
      • Who said that DOS was dead? - rr, 31.07.2007, 20:17
        • Who said that DOS was dead? - lucho, 01.08.2007, 14:55
      • Who said that DOS was dead? - Rugxulo, 01.08.2007, 04:13
    • Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test LINUX LINUX ... ... - DOS386, 02.08.2007, 15:28
      • Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test LINUX LINUX ... ... - Rugxulo, 03.08.2007, 05:09
  • Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test || Slowest FreeDOS - DOS386, 02.08.2007, 15:26