Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test (Miscellaneous)
> The eternal question: Which DOS to choose? Speed is also an important
> criteria! Today I did the following simple test. Copied a 68 MB file from
> one FAT32 drive with 16 KB clusters to another FAT32 drive with 4 KB
> clusters.
Copying a huge file isn't exactly the most speed-sensitive task around. (Granted, I do greatly appreciate such informal benchmarks.) BTW, I read somewhere that someone said (MS-DOS?) XCOPY is faster than normal COPY, so maybe you should try that. :)
P.S. You think FreeDOS' COPY is slow now? You should try "beta8" (esp. copying from floppy) and see how much it could really chug!!!
> (As to the alleged future in FreeDOS: No, it's past. All DOS is past.
> Let's face it. The only past that is future too is Unix. Eternal like the
> Egypt pyramids... Still alive and evolving in Mac OS X, Solaris, the BSD
> family, Linux and so on.)
For home desktop use, yes, most people want all modern Internet conveniences and GUIs, hardware support, etc. DOS probably will not ever be at the forefront of that. However, DOS is far from dead: virtualization (QEMU, BOCHS), embedded systems (digital cameras, .mp3 players), old legacy recycled PCs (dedicated gaming PCs, point-of-sale machines), bootstrap OS for other OSes (OctaOS or DexOS or DOS-Minix) or very low-level stuff (e.g. upgrade your BIOS), emulation (DOSBox, DOSEMU), or maybe it will spawn yet another OS (e.g. FreeDOS-32), etc.
Yes, Linux is good and popular. Linux Linux Linux Linux Linux Linux Linux Linux Linux ... (as if it needs the advertising, sheesh!)
---
Know your limits.h
Complete thread:
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - lucho, 30.07.2007, 17:38 (Miscellaneous)
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - rr, 31.07.2007, 09:20
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - lucho, 31.07.2007, 17:14
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - rr, 31.07.2007, 17:34
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - sol, 30.11.2007, 17:51
- Speed differences negligible - Japheth, 03.12.2007, 12:25
- Speed differences - be more specific - Rugxulo, 05.12.2007, 22:31
- Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 05.12.2007, 23:02
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 05.12.2007, 23:05
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 13:01
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 17:50
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 17:59
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:32
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:35
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 18:49
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:55
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 19:08
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 21:30
- Speed differences - be more specific - rr, 07.12.2007, 09:43
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 07.12.2007, 11:11
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 17:09
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 07.12.2007, 20:22
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 20:51
- Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 07.12.2007, 21:27
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 22:40
- Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 07.12.2007, 23:20
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 08.12.2007, 01:00
- Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 07.12.2007, 23:20
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 22:40
- Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 07.12.2007, 21:27
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 20:51
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 07.12.2007, 20:22
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 17:09
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 21:30
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 19:08
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:55
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:32
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 17:59
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 17:50
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 13:01
- Speed differences negligible - sol, 06.12.2007, 01:14
- Speed differences - be more specific - Rugxulo, 05.12.2007, 22:31
- Speed differences negligible - Japheth, 03.12.2007, 12:25
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - lucho, 31.07.2007, 17:14
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - Rugxulo, 31.07.2007, 10:12
- Who said that DOS was dead? - lucho, 31.07.2007, 19:07
- Who said that DOS was dead? - Steve, 31.07.2007, 19:50
- Who said that DOS was dead? - rr, 31.07.2007, 20:17
- Who said that DOS was dead? - lucho, 01.08.2007, 14:55
- Who said that DOS was dead? - Rugxulo, 01.08.2007, 04:13
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test LINUX LINUX ... ... - DOS386, 02.08.2007, 15:28
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test LINUX LINUX ... ... - Rugxulo, 03.08.2007, 05:09
- Who said that DOS was dead? - lucho, 31.07.2007, 19:07
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test || Slowest FreeDOS - DOS386, 02.08.2007, 15:26
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - rr, 31.07.2007, 09:20