Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test (Miscellaneous)
> Copying a huge file isn't exactly the most speed-sensitive task around.
For FAT processing (searching and allocation of clusters), it is. And actually that's the most important job of the DOS kernel here, not copying data itself.
> (Granted, I do greatly appreciate such informal benchmarks.) BTW, I read
> somewhere that someone said (MS-DOS?) XCOPY is faster than normal COPY,
> so maybe you should try that. :)
I used 4DOS COPY /B, but as I've already tried, XCOPY or almost any other used application doesn't make significant difference here.
> What versions? What options?
Last versions, same configuration for all kernels. No need to post my CONFIGs?
> MS-DOS 7.x? (for FAT32)
Yes, if you re-read my previous post, you'll see that both drives are FAT32.
> Does ROM-DOS support FAT32 natively?
Yes, ROM-DOS 7.10 which I tested does. It also can support LFNs natively.
> OK, then "Good bye!" to you.
You drive me, an innocent and even unregistered user of your forum, away?! OK!
> I don't want you to live in the past.
Thank you for your care, but perhaps I myself prefer living in the past?!
OK, before I go away as you want, I'll confess: DOS, Mac OS X, Solaris, *BSD and Linux have all something very important in common: They have nothing to do with MS-Windows! And that's why I like them all, despite some disappointments.
Complete thread:
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - lucho, 30.07.2007, 17:38 (Miscellaneous)
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - rr, 31.07.2007, 09:20
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - lucho, 31.07.2007, 17:14
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - rr, 31.07.2007, 17:34
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - sol, 30.11.2007, 17:51
- Speed differences negligible - Japheth, 03.12.2007, 12:25
- Speed differences - be more specific - Rugxulo, 05.12.2007, 22:31
- Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 05.12.2007, 23:02
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 05.12.2007, 23:05
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 13:01
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 17:50
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 17:59
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:32
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:35
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 18:49
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:55
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 19:08
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 21:30
- Speed differences - be more specific - rr, 07.12.2007, 09:43
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 07.12.2007, 11:11
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 17:09
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 07.12.2007, 20:22
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 20:51
- Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 07.12.2007, 21:27
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 22:40
- Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 07.12.2007, 23:20
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 08.12.2007, 01:00
- Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 07.12.2007, 23:20
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 22:40
- Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 07.12.2007, 21:27
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 20:51
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 07.12.2007, 20:22
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 17:09
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 21:30
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 19:08
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:55
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:32
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 17:59
- Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 17:50
- Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 13:01
- Speed differences negligible - sol, 06.12.2007, 01:14
- Speed differences - be more specific - Rugxulo, 05.12.2007, 22:31
- Speed differences negligible - Japheth, 03.12.2007, 12:25
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - lucho, 31.07.2007, 17:14
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - Rugxulo, 31.07.2007, 10:12
- Who said that DOS was dead? - lucho, 31.07.2007, 19:07
- Who said that DOS was dead? - Steve, 31.07.2007, 19:50
- Who said that DOS was dead? - rr, 31.07.2007, 20:17
- Who said that DOS was dead? - lucho, 01.08.2007, 14:55
- Who said that DOS was dead? - Rugxulo, 01.08.2007, 04:13
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test LINUX LINUX ... ... - DOS386, 02.08.2007, 15:28
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test LINUX LINUX ... ... - Rugxulo, 03.08.2007, 05:09
- Who said that DOS was dead? - lucho, 31.07.2007, 19:07
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test || Slowest FreeDOS - DOS386, 02.08.2007, 15:26
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - rr, 31.07.2007, 09:20