DOS ain't dead - Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test

Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test (Miscellaneous)

posted by rr , Berlin, Germany, 31.07.2007, 17:34

> > Copying a huge file isn't exactly the most speed-sensitive task around.

I didn't write this.

> > (Granted, I do greatly appreciate such informal benchmarks.) BTW, I
> read
> > somewhere that someone said (MS-DOS?) XCOPY is faster than normal COPY,
> > so maybe you should try that. :)

I didn't write this.

> > What versions? What options?
>
> Last versions, same configuration for all kernels. No need to post my
> CONFIGs?

Why not? Maybe others would like to some run benchmarks and compare results.

> > MS-DOS 7.x? (for FAT32)
>
> Yes, if you re-read my previous post, you'll see that both drives are
> FAT32.

That's why I wrote "(for FAT32)". IIRC FAT32 TSR from DR-DOS works in MS-DOS 6.22 as well.

> Yes, ROM-DOS 7.10 which I tested does. It also can support LFNs natively.

Ah, OK. :-)

> > OK, then "Good bye!" to you.
>
> You drive me, an innocent and even unregistered user of your forum, away?!

Men are never innocent. Ask some girl about it. ;-)

No, but from your previous message I got my impression, you wish to leave the DOS community.

> > I don't want you to live in the past.
>
> Thank you for your care, but perhaps I myself prefer living in the past?!

Then that's something completely different.

---
Forum admin

Post reply

Complete thread:

Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - lucho, 30.07.2007, 17:38 (Miscellaneous)
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - rr, 31.07.2007, 09:20
  - Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - lucho, 31.07.2007, 17:14
    - Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - rr, 31.07.2007, 17:34
    - Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - sol, 30.11.2007, 17:51
      - Speed differences negligible - Japheth, 03.12.2007, 12:25
        Speed differences - be more specific - Rugxulo, 05.12.2007, 22:31
        Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 05.12.2007, 23:02
        Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 05.12.2007, 23:05
        Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 13:01
        Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 17:50
        Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 17:59
        Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:32
        Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:35
        Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 18:49
        Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 18:55
        Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 06.12.2007, 19:08
        Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 06.12.2007, 21:30
        Speed differences - be more specific - rr, 07.12.2007, 09:43
        Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 07.12.2007, 11:11
        Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 17:09
        Speed differences - be more specific - tom, 07.12.2007, 20:22
        Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 20:51
        Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 07.12.2007, 21:27
        Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 07.12.2007, 22:40
        Speed differences - be more specific - Japheth, 07.12.2007, 23:20
        Speed differences - be more specific - sol, 08.12.2007, 01:00
        Speed differences negligible - sol, 06.12.2007, 01:14
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test - Rugxulo, 31.07.2007, 10:12
  - Who said that DOS was dead? - lucho, 31.07.2007, 19:07
    - Who said that DOS was dead? - Steve, 31.07.2007, 19:50
    - Who said that DOS was dead? - rr, 31.07.2007, 20:17
      - Who said that DOS was dead? - lucho, 01.08.2007, 14:55
    - Who said that DOS was dead? - Rugxulo, 01.08.2007, 04:13
  - Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test LINUX LINUX ... ... - DOS386, 02.08.2007, 15:28
    - Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test LINUX LINUX ... ... - Rugxulo, 03.08.2007, 05:09
- Ultimate DOS kernel file copy speed test || Slowest FreeDOS - DOS386, 02.08.2007, 15:26