Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

UIDE vs. XDMA32 & XCDROM32 (Announce)

posted by lucho, 28.11.2007, 09:28

> 1.75K is very good, but every byte of low memory counts, so if the
> JLM version can do significantly better, then IMO it's well worth it.

Yes, but these 1.75K can be in upper memory (so no low memory is used), if you specify DEVICEHIGH=UIDE.SYS in CONFIG.SYS, and it's for a HDD/CD/DVD cache size of up to 200MB (a few KB more are taken for a cache size of up to 1GB), whereas neither XDMA[32] nor XCDROM[32] do any caching. Plus there are other drawbacks of the old XDMA/XCDROM too (bugs, less control and compatibility, and so on).

Thread locked
 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 473 users online (0 registered, 473 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum