Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

embargo counterstrikes (Announce)

posted by Japheth Homepage, Germany (South), 29.11.2007, 09:39

> I think that except as examples how to write a JLM, they don't do much
> good now when we have UIDE which takes just 1.75K (for up to 200 MB of
> cache!) of upper memory - a very small amount for a fully caching UDMA
> driver of HDD/CD/DVD. The only reason A. Grech added XDMA32 is to upset
> Jack again, not to help his users. Isn't that a big hypocrisy?

Hypo, there is a misconception in your thoughts. I don't act unreasonable. As you might be able to realize, all the drivers - HIMEMX, XCDROM32 and XDMA32 - were released at times when your master had installed his little embargos. And the intention behind these action was to make him learn that his drivers are important, but not ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY, and his embargos are therefore a waste of time. Some pain can drastically increase the learning effect, so it is indeed appreciated that Jack was slightly upset (thanks for confirming that!), but this is just a side effect.

Yes, the highly optimized UIDE might be slightly faster than the combination XDMA32 + LBACACHE, but almost nobody will care. It's just this famous 0.1% part of users who does.

---
MS-DOS forever!

Thread locked
 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 436 users online (0 registered, 436 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum