Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Search:  
Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

"Socialism" (Announce)

posted by Steve Homepage E-mail, US, 30.11.2007, 15:33

> For historical reasons, my country never had a "wonderful condition", but
> the second part of the 1960's and the first part of the 1970's were its
> best years. What happened after was determined by multiple factors which
> is not here the place to discuss. Keep in mind just the fact that the foul
> game played by a mondial institution
Which institution?

> the change of regime in a Middle Eastern country famed for its literature and its carpets
You mean Iran? Relevance?

> and not at least
> an execrable case of capital treason, were the principal reasons for the
> disaster that followed. I agree with you that the systematization of some
> villages was a foolish policy of modernization, but do you know how those
> villages looked before?
So why not rebuild houses and install sewers? Answer: The purpose wasn't to help the poor bastards, but to destroy their communities and cultures. The world knows it. Stop lying.

> For the miserable conditions in which those poor
> orphan children lived, who was guilty, the socialist regime or the
> accursed staff of the Orphanages who stole the money which the State gave
> for the children and used the money for their own needs?
The regime. Since when does a Communist regime trust anyone to do the right thing without supervision? Answer: It doesn't. Somebody high up either had a hand in it, or was too drunk to care. Or both. (And that's assuming the money existed to begin with - who knows if it did?)

> What you call "palaces" were in fact "villas"
Evasion. "Villa" covers a wide range, overlapping with palace. Do you think your leaders lived in 2 or 3 rooms, with modest furniture?

> and I'm sure that your rulers don't live in hovels.
But my leaders are big capitalists, not socialists.

> Those who went into exile did it because the country dipped into poverty
Evasion. Many who left were doing well. But they conveniently drop out of your equation.

> for the reasons I shown you above.
You have shown nothing.

> Regarding the imprisonment
> of dissenters I tell you something which I'm sure you will not understand:
> if someone was imprisoned, it means that he/she defied the law. But there
> was not such a thing as political infractions in our penal code. The
> point is: don't be a dissenter as long as you are not clean.
Nothing labeled political infractions. Therefore dissenters had to be labeled something else. Were there no honest dissenters? Did Party officials with dirty hands all go to prison? Wake up.

Thread locked
 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 461 users online (0 registered, 461 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum