Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

.................. (Announce)

posted by Japheth Homepage, Germany (South), 30.11.2007, 19:34

> > Time to lock another thread, eh? :-|
>
> It seems so. You could lock it at 23:59 GMT today...

@rr: Or even better, consider to lock this clown's account. Since he is so eagerly awaiting this board's funeral, he can as well wait "outside" IMO. And if there is "need", he can use "Udo's forum" to get rid of his "loads".

> It is also interesting that, if A. Grech and his friends here believe that
> XDMA32 is so "great", why do you have a new link to Jack's drivers on
> FreeDOS IBIBLIO? And if only Grech's "slight difference" exists between
> using XDMA32 / LBACACHE and using UIDE, why does IBIBLIO have a mirror of
> XMGR/UIDE at all? LBACACHE hasn't changed for years, while Jack took Tom
> Ehlert's suggestion in 2003 of using the HMA as a way to save space,
> without needing anything incompatible like JLMs. Do people really like
> losing all that upper-memory for LBACACHE, when UIDE needs only
> 1.75K for up to a 200 MB cache, 3.5K for 250 MB and can reach up to 1 GB?
> Try getting to any of those sizes with LBACACHE!

[................... snip]

Have you anything else in your head besides "caches"? This is such a minor issue in the current DOS world, but judging from your propaganda it's the most important thing in the world. Absolutely boring ...

If it makes you happy: UIDE - or whatever name your master is willing to give it once it "reappears" - is the best cache of all times, nothing will ever reach it.

---
MS-DOS forever!

Thread locked
 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 436 users online (0 registered, 436 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum