Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Search:  
Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

"Socialism" (Announce)

posted by Khusraw, 30.11.2007, 17:09
(edited by Khusraw on 30.11.2007, 17:24)

> So why not rebuild houses and install sewers? Answer: The purpose wasn't
> to help the poor bastards, but to destroy their communities and cultures.
> The world knows it. Stop lying.
You don't know what you are talking about. The systematization was a foolish plan which aimed to transform those poor villages in little towns. What community and what culture has been destroyed?! It's simply ridiculous!

> The regime. Since when does a Communist regime trust anyone to do the
> right thing without supervision? Answer: It doesn't. Somebody high up
> either had a hand in it, or was too drunk to care. Or both. (And that's
> assuming the money existed to begin with - who knows if it did?)
The supervisors were not at all at such "high" level as you think. They were bored and corruptible officemen who had their share in all that business. Who knew what they were doing? You are so stupid to imagine that in the socialist regime there are eyes and ears everywhere?

> Evasion. Many who left were doing well. But they conveniently drop out of
> your equation.
They thought they will do even better. If you imply that they were persecuted, you are far from reality. Perhaps they fooled people to believe so, in order for them to gain some material advantages.

> Nothing labeled political infractions. Therefore dissenters had to
> be labeled something else. Were there no honest dissenters? Did Party
> officials with dirty hands all go to prison? Wake up.
Tell me the name of a single party official who defied the law and was forgiven. Tell me the name of a single honest dissenter who went to prison. You have no idea of how the things worked. If someone was dissenter, the regime agents asked him what he/she really needs for stop being a dissenter. The most part were happy with what they received. But if they didn't reach an agreement, the dissenter was searched for small common law offences. If found guilty, he/she was either fined or sent to prison for that offence. If not, he/she was just put under surveillance in order to prevent his/her collaboration with the agents of some inimical countries from both the East and the West.

Edit: corrected some language mistakes

Thread locked
 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 450 users online (0 registered, 450 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum