Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Search:  
Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

"Socialism" (Announce)

posted by Steve Homepage E-mail, US, 30.11.2007, 17:58

> > So why not rebuild houses and install sewers? Answer: The purpose wasn't
> > to help the poor bastards, but to destroy their communities and cultures.
> > The world knows it. Stop lying.
>
> You don't know what you are talking about. The systematization was a
> foolish plan which aimed to transform those poor villages in little towns.
> What community and what culture has been destroyed?! It's simply
> ridiculous!
It's known to the world. Why waste your time lying? Are you going to erase all the information that is available to anyone who Googles Romania + systematization right now?

> > The regime. Since when does a Communist regime trust anyone to do the
> > right thing without supervision? Answer: It doesn't. Somebody high up
> > either had a hand in it, or was too drunk to care. Or both. (And that's
> > assuming the money existed to begin with - who knows if it did?)
>
> The supervisors were not at all at such "high" level as you think. They
> were bored and corruptible officemen who had their share in all that
> business. Who knew what they were doing?
Nobody in Bucharest looked at accounts and reports?

> You are so stupid to imagine that in the socialist regime there are eyes and ears everywhere?
It did for dissenters. It must be true - you say it.

> > Evasion. Many who left were doing well. But they conveniently drop out of
> > your equation.
>
> They thought they will do even better. If you imply that they were
> persecuted, you are far from reality. Perhaps they fooled people to
> believe so, in order for them to gain some material advantages.
Of course! (I'm slapping my head).

> > Nothing labeled political infractions. Therefore dissenters had to
> > be labeled something else. Were there no honest dissenters? Did Party
> > officials with dirty hands all go to prison? Wake up.
>
> Tell me the name of a single party official who defied the law and was
> forgiven.
Big Nikolae. Until that last little bit of trouble.

> If someone was
> dissenter, the regime agents asked him what he/she really needs for stop
> being a dissenter. The most part were happy with what they received. But
> if they didn't reach an agreement, the dissenter was searched for small
> common law offences. If found guilty, he/she was either fined or sent to
> prison for that offence. If not, he/she was just put under surveillance in
> order to prevent his/her collaboration with the agents of some inimical
> countries from both the East and the West.
I could not have described it better myself - the workings of a paranoid police state.

Thread locked
 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 445 users online (0 registered, 445 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum