Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

about to fix the "final" doslfn bug (Announce)

posted by Richard, 14.04.2022, 20:49

>
>
> Released DOSLFN 0.41f, which
> includes a basic version check (doslfn will install, not try
> and control doslfnms; I should probably have made it say
> another version was installed, but I didn't).
>



Using the latest doslfn(MS) (14 April 2022), re-ran comparison of

without/with doslfn(MS)
USBFAT16/USBFAT32
XMSFAT16/XMSFAT32
SMSFAT16/SMSFAT32

for file set (10 files + 4 directories)

note SMARTDRV NOT USED in these tests and I think all relevant programs (himemSX, rdrvSX32, etc) are the latest updates.

As before (same sequence)...




1
[image]




2
[image]




3
[image]




4
[image]




5
[image]




6
[image]




7
[image]




8
[image]




9
[image]




A
[image]




B
[image]




C
[image]







I made a mistake that I did not doslfnMS -u before I started my series of .bat files (first part doslfnMS) (FDauto.bat doslsfnMS, SET COMDIR=lfn ...) and ended up with many duplicates from a sub-folder in C:\ being inserted into the C:\ ROOT. Because of all the @echo OFF (to make the screen captures look nice), if there were any error messages, I could not see them.


Will now very shortly repeat above but with much larger file set.




Is RT giving me the blank line before "Elapsed time: ...) - if so, option to not have blank line?

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 340 users online (0 registered, 340 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum